About Me

Jack Kay is a professor of communication at Eastern Michigan University. He studies the power of language.

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Banning 'Loaded' Words in Tests

by guest blogger Patrice G.


Liberating people through the abolishing of words is an idea many have had and few have succeeded in doing, but still organizations use the tactic. For instance, New York city schools are proposing to remove numerous words from the city's standardized test for liberating purposes. Apparently words like divorce, dinosaurs, birthdays, religion, halloween, television, and Christmas are offensive and oppressive words. Surprised or not surprised? Well, either way take a gander at the article below and share your thoughts:


New York city schools want to ban 'loaded words' from tests

By Brian Vitagliano, CNN

New York (CNN) – Divorce. Dinosaurs, Birthdays. Religion. Halloween. Christmas. Television. These are a few of the 50-plus words and references the New York City Department of Education is hoping to ban from the city’s standardized tests.

The banned word list was made public – and attracted considerable criticism – when the city’s education department released this year’s "request for proposal" on March 8, 2010. The request for proposal is sent to test publishers around the country trying to get the job of revamping math and English tests for the City of New York.

The Department of Education's says that avoiding sensitive words on tests is nothing new, and that New York City is not the only locale to do so. California avoids the use of the word "weed" on tests and Florida avoids the phrases that use "Hurricane" or "Wildfires," according to a statement by the New York City Department of Education.

In its request for proposal, the NYC Department of Education explained it wanted to avoid certain words if the "the topic is controversial among the adult population and might not be acceptable in a state-mandated testing situation; the topic has been overused in standardized tests or textbooks and is thus overly familiar and/or boring to students; the topic appears biased against (or toward) some group of people."

Matthew Mittenthal, a spokesman for the NYC Department of Education, said this is the fifth year they have created such a list. He said such topics "could evoke unpleasant emotions in the students."

"Dinosaurs" evoking unpleasant emotions? The New York Post speculated that the "dinosaurs" could "call to mind evolution, which might upset fundamentalists.”

But what the tabloid failed to realize is that those "fundamentalists" who oppose evolution on religious grounds, believe wholeheartedly in dinosaurs.

Young Earth creationists, or Biblical creationists as they prefer to be called, often point to dinosaurs in making their arguments. They say dinosaurs and humans roamed Earth together, citing legends of dragons and say the fossil record shows the earth is 6,000 years old, though few paleontologists and geologists share this theory.

At the Creation Museum in Petersburg, Kentucky, the heart of the Young Earth Creationism movement, dinosaur models and exhibits fill the museum displays and gift shop.

Apparently many of the words on New York’s list were avoided because of faith-based concerns.

For instance, the use of the word "birthday" or the phrase "birthday celebrations" may offend Jehovah's Witnesses, who do not celebrate birthdays. A spokesperson for the Jehovah's Witnesses declined to comment on the use of the word "birthday."

The Department of Education would not go on the record to explain the specific reasons for each word, which has left many to speculate and draw their own conclusions.

Halloween may suggest paganism; divorce may conjure up uneasy feelings for children in the midst of a divorce within their family. One phrase that may surprise many, the term "Rock 'n' Roll" was on the "avoid" list.

And not good news for Italians: the Department of Education also advised avoiding references to types of food, such as pepperoni, products they said "persons of some religions or cultures may not indulge in."

The Department of Education said, "This is standard language that has been used by test publishers for many years and allows our students to complete practice exams without distraction."

Stanford University Professor Sam Wineburg is an expert in the field of education and director of the Stanford History Education Group.

When reached by phone said Wineburg, after a brief pause on the line, "the purpose of education is to create unpleasant experiences in us. ... The Latin meaning if education is 'to go out.' Education is not about making us feel warm and fuzzy inside."

Wineburg questioned the idea that the New York City Department of Education would want to "shield kids from these types of encounters." He said the goal of education is to "prepare them," adding "this is how we dumb down public schools."

CNN's Eric Marrapodi contributed to this report.

article link: http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/28/new-york-city-schools-ban-loaded-words-from-tests/

MPAA Gives "Bully" an R Rating

by guest blogger Mike

In response to the rash of LGBT teen suicides over the past two years director Lee Hirsch decided to draw attention to the problem of bullying by releasing the movie "Bully". This movie tells the story of teens who are the victim of bullying and acts as a plea for parents, students, and teachers to do more to stop it. Harvey Weinstein, the head of the studio who produced the film, was planning on taking the films to schools as a means to directly confront bullies with the consequences of their actions. Sadly, the MPAA - the group which assigns movie ratings - has decided that the film is too obscene to be given a PG-13 rating. The MPAA cites a few vulgarities as the reason for the rating. However, many are concerned that the traditionally conservative MPAA is using the R rating as a means of enforcing "traditional values". An R rating is problematic as it means that most kids won't be able to see the film, negating the effectiveness of the message. Celebrities and students from across the country have petitioned the MPAA to lower the rating to a PG-13, but the MPAA has yet to budge.


Tuesday, March 27, 2012

A Million Hoodies


One of a million hoodies.

RACIST CHANT DURING NCAA MEN'S BASKETBALL TOURNAMENT

by guest blogger cflores6

As some of you may know the 2012 NCAA men's basketball tournament ( March Madness!) is coming to an end. As the championship game gets closer fans tend to become even more rowdy and excited and they are likely to act or say things based off our their emotions. Such as, "You suck Ref, that was a terrible call!" Unsporteman-like behavior is never acceptable, but to shout out a racist slur at an athlete is just plain stupid and wrong.

Members of the University of Southern Mississippi's pep band taunted Kansas State player, Angel Rodriguez with a racist chant during the teams' NCAA tournament game. The band members chanted "where's your green card?" and Rodriguez approached the free-throw line. Southern Mississippi has revoked the scholarships of five students who took part in the incident and removed them from the band. They also were required to complete a 2 hour cultural sensitivity training course. Rodriguez has accepted apologies from the university. Do you think the situation was handled appropriately?

articles at:

espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/tournament

www.washingtonpost.com

Hate Crime in San Diego?

by guest blogger Jenni

This article pertains to a possible hate crime. A 32 year old Iraqi woman was beaten to death in her home in San Diego. Her body was found by her 17 year old daughter. There was a note next to her body that said the woman was a terrorist and she should go back to her country. There have been no leads on who killed the woman as of yet. Why would this not automatically be considered a hate crime? It seems that this should automatically be considered a hate crime. It is very unfortunate that this woman had to die at the hands of someone who thought something of her that most likely was not true.

http://www.freep.com/article/20120327/NEWS02/120327042/Shaima-Alawadi-Iraqi-American-beating-death?

Thank you,

Jenni

Black Teenager Gunned-Down, Legal Protections Afforded to Murderer

by guest blogger Ben

News coverage has spread nationally regarding the murder of Trayvon Martin, a 17-year-old boy who was gunned-down by an armed vigillante in an Orlando suburb. Trayvon was unarmed and had just finished purchasing a bag of Skittles and an iced tea from a convenience store. While walking home, Trayvon was pursued by George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer. Zimmerman followed Trayvon in his car, defying the advice of 911 operators to not pursue the teenager or exit his vehicle.

After hanging up with the 911 operator, Zimmerman continued to pursue Trayvon (who was now running in an attempt to evade Zimmerman chasing him in his vehicle). Zimmerman stopped his vehicle, exited, drew a weapon, and fatally shot Trayvon. Other neighbors had placed calls to 911 in the intervening time; Trayvon can be heard calling for help and pleading for his life in the last few moments before gun shots can be heard on the 911 tapes.

Zimmerman was not arrested and is not currently being prosecuted because of Florida's "Stand Your Ground" law - one which allows citizens to use deadly force against individuals who they have "reasonable suspicion" intend to harm them. Similar laws exist in states throughout the country and are being pushed by groups like the NRA.

Mother Jones Magazine has published an excellent synopsis of the case, including copies of the audio recordings from 911 operators and other media coverage. These can be viewed here:

http://motherjones.com/politics/2012/03/what-happened-trayvon-martin-explained

Glen Beck, a conservative radio and FOX News personality, has called Trayvon the "aggressor" on his website, The Blaze. According to Beck, Trayvon was the aggressor in the confrontation with Zimmerman. The articles continue that the Rev. Al Sharpton is inciting racial conflict by advocating for Trayvon and for the arrest and prosecution of Zimmerman.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/al-sharpton-dismisses-self-defense-argument-in-shooting-of-teen/
http://motherjones.com/mojo/2012/03/glenn-beck-blaze-trayvon-martin

Best and Worst States for Women

by guest blogger Genevieve


“The states in which women live well and get decent pay -- the rating
factors in education levels, health insurance, and employment…
includes Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, California,
Vermont, New York, Minnesota, Washington and New Hampshire.”

The article below describes the rationale of iVillage recent campaign
to blog the ten best and ten worst states to live in as a woman.

“The worst places for women are in the South, although Idaho and
Indiana rank among the bottom dwellers. The other places in which
women are less healthy, less educated and get paid less are
Mississippi, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Arkansas, Kentucky, West Virginia,
Alabama, Louisiana, and South Carolina.”

It is common to understand women’s rights as a national problem, which
frankly it is. As a female voter – should my focus center on state
rights that effect immediately?

Read more: http://www.seattlepi.com/local/connelly/article/Washington-One-of-the-nation-s-best-states-for-3427995.php#ixzz1qEsTlOsN

"The Hunger Games"

by guest blogger Caleb

With the Release of the movie "The Hunger Games" this past weekend there has been some shocking backlash on the internet by "fans" who were angry when three characters were black, even though the book stated that they were dark-skinned. check this links and prepared to be shocked.



"The Hiunger 8

by guest blogger Caleb

With the Release of the movie "The Hunger Games" this past weekend there has been some shocking backlash on the internet by "fans" who were angry when three characters were black, even though the book stated that they were dark-skinned. check this links and prepared to be shocked.


Oppression and Neighborhood Watch

by guest blogger Rebecca

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/as-justice-department-investigates-shooting-of-florida-teen-doubts-arise-about-federal-charges/2012/03/20/gIQAzGeRQS_story.html

Even while this shooting may not constitute what is legally considered a hate crime, the man did shoot and kill a teenager so he should be arrested on that account alone- What other factors could be at play here besides racism?

· Should neighborhood crime watch participants be allowed to carry weapons and should they have to pass some type of screening interview?

· What do you think about the sentence “ this kid looks like he is up to no good and they always get away?” Could this have been phrased differently so that the outcome could have been different??

· Do any of you feel like that biased language is on the rise or is it just so focused on in the media that any event makes it seem like this when it may actually be on the decrease? Key phrase is “seems to.”

Freedom, oppression and social media

by guest blogger LADYDIVA21

http://www.viewpointonline.net/freedom-and-oppression-on-facebook-and-twitter.html

This article talks about the Pakistani people and their opinions about
facebook and twitter. How these sight are used to to liberate others
and to also oppress them. The most popular Pakistani profiles on
Twitter and Facebook, and the most popular blogs belong to people who
would be opinion leaders in any case. Some of them hold key government
offices, others are celebrities offline, and most were journalists or
became journalists...Why is this important?..This article tells you
why...so enjoy reading...

Possibilities? What possibilities?

Question: what kind of social changes will social media bring? Who
will it empower? What will they do with that power? In the light of
these questions.

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Race and Suspicion

by guest blogger Arthur V.

http://globalgrind.com/news/michael-skolnik-trayvon-martin-george-zimmerman-race-sanford-florida-photos-pictures

There has been a lot of coverage on the murder of Trayvon Martin in the news lately and obviously we have given some of the attention on this blog. Trayvon’s story highlights the issue of race and suspicion. The article below was written by an individual (Michael Skolnik) who has decided to speak up on this issue and point up just how privileged white skin can make someone. The powerful message he spreads is the idea that he will never look suspicious to the people around him because he is not black. The blog post has been circulated around the internet and serves to help our society take a step forward toward a language of liberation by acknowledging the rights white people take for granted by not extending the same rights to the oppressed. I hope many people will hear this message and choose to speak to those around even though this is considered a taboo conversation topic. Maybe the fact that this topic is considered taboo says something about our society and how serious we are about invoking change.

Skin Color and Oppression

by guest blogger M. Peoples

Does the color of someone's skin make them the target of oppressive acts? What happens or should happen when this leads to a death?

A 17 year old African-American teenager was gunned down by a neighborhood watch captain this weekend under the guise of self-defense because the boy looked suspicious after leaving a store to make a purchase. There have been several blogs and articles released on this situation. Click on the links below to get the full story from different perspectives and to answer the questions that I have asked.

http://inamerica.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/19/opinion-trayvon-martin-not-george-zimmerman-was-engaged-in-self-defense/










If we can't blame the police then who do we blame?

by guest blogger Gordon Shumway

http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/03/12/young-black-and-male-in-america/you-cant-blame-the-police?scp=4&sq=nypd%20racism&st=cse


In this opinions page article titled “You Can't Blame The Police” writer Peter Moskos argues the reason why the police focus most of their attention on young black males is because that's where the highest murder rate is (he's talking about in NYC). He goes into more detail for his reasoning, and ends the article by saying “Ideally, we'd end the war on drugs, the greatest cause of racial disparity in the criminal justice system. But until we do, we need more police and smarter policing, not a knee-jerk politically correct response.” Needless to say the article struck a nerve with me, and I disagree with the author. Anyone have any thoughts on this one?

Are Children an Oppressed Class?

by guest blogger LADYDIVA21

This article talks about children being an oppressed class and the
innuendo that comes when you speak against another oppressed
class...Talking about these differences gets tricky, however. If you
say you simply do not want to be treated the way a member of another
oppressed class is treated, it comes across as a desire to be more
respected, and less ill-treated, because you are not a member of this
other class and that contributes to the stigma they must face. Children
are smaller and weaker than most adults, and at very young ages unable
to provide for their needs independently at all, they are deeply
vulnerable to oppression. My question is did you feel oppressed as a
younger child growing up? Did you feel like your VOICE or opinion
mattered in your house hold? why or why not explain?...Do you agree or
disagree with the article, are children an oppressed class in your
opinion...Are their voices heard?...

http://www.genderacrossborders.com/2010/02/25/children-oppressed-class/

Oppression in the Language of Laws


by guest blogger Purple


Almost a month after the death of 17 year old, Trayvon Martin, the incident is garnering national attention and outrage. On February 26th, Trayvon Martin was shot to death in the gated community where his father lived in Orlando, Florida. He was visiting his father there. The shooter is 28 year old, George Zimmerman, a self-appointed neighborhood watch captain. Zimmerman deemed Martin “suspicious” as he spotted him walking in the neighborhood, after having returned from a nearby convenience store to purchase a pack of Skittles and an iced tea. Zimmerman called 911 to report Martin’s “suspicious” behavior and ignored instructions to not pursue Martin. He ended up confronting Martin and shooting him in what he claims was in self-defense. Recently, 911 calls and witness reports have been publicly released, and largely challenge Zimmerman’s claims of self-defense.


This case brings to light Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” law, which has thus far provided Zimmerman immunity from arrest despite the numerous amounts of evidence from 911 calls and witness accounts. The Sanford Police Department in Florida maintain they don’t have enough evidence to dispute Zimmerman’s claim and arrest him. But, back to the “Stand Your Ground” law; the law was passed in Florida in 2005 and basically gives people the right to use deadly force if they feel they are being threatened without first trying to retreat. While I read the law was partially introduced in support of the fight against domestic violence, Trayvon Martin’s case allows me to see the potential for oppression with the law. Like any law, it can be misused and abused, and in this case, which reeks of racism, it can lead to injustice.

What do you think of the “Stand Your Ground” law? Apparently the states of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wyoming all have laws similar to it.


For more information on the case, check out some of the links below… and also do your own research.

*Update: Late Monday, the FBI and Department of Justice announced plans to investigate the shooting of Trayvon Martin.


http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/03/18/446768/what-everyone-should-know-about-about-trayvon-martin-1995-2012/?mobile=nc


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgNvPdRVnyQ


http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-57400017-504083/trayvon-martin-rallies-held-college-students-demand-arrest-of-george-zimmerman-who-fatally-shot-17-year-old-in-sanford-fla/


http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/03/19/148937626/trayvon-martin-killing-puts-stand-your-ground-law-in-spotlight


http://www.wesh.com/r/30719969/detail.html


http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/20/10775671-trayvon-martin-case-to-go-to-grand-jury-fla-state-attorney-announces

Monday, March 19, 2012

Age Discrimination in the Workplace: Is it Ageism or your Attitude?

Submitted by Guest Blogger Patrice G.


Unfortunately, retiring at 55 or 65 years of age has become unrealistic for most workers. Therefore, it is not uncommon these days to see people working well into their 70's and 80's, because of the horrible economic status of most Americans.
But what should not be common is Ageism, however, the statements listed below are widely used when younger employees voice their opinions on veteran employees:
  1. Rigid and stuck in their ways.
  2. Poor or failing health. Medical issues impact attendance and productivity.
  3. Afraid of new technologies.
  4. Slower to learn new concepts. Slow to change.
  5. Years of highly developed opinions; unwillingness to hear new ideas.
  6. Expensive. They demand higher wages.
  7. Poor investment because they won’t be staying with the company for long enough to get a return on investment with their training.
  8. Physically slow moving. Low energy. Unable to sustain long hours if required.
  9. Risk adverse.
Do you find any or all of the above statements to be oppressive? Why or Why not?

What would you propose to help lessen or end the Ageism (language of oppression) towards the more veteran employees?


read the entire article here: http://www.forbes.com/sites/moneywisewomen/2011/03/02/age-discrimination-in-the-workplace-is-it-ageism-or-your-attitude/


Oppression Between Personality Types

by guest blogger Simone

http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/18/opinion/cain-introverts-power/index.html?hpt=hp_bn6

Here is an opinion article from CNN about the long-standing debate between the personality types of Introverts vs Extroverts.

Many people who consider themselves to be introverts, have felt that they have been wrongly criticized or judged for being 'aloof', a 'loner', or anti-social by some extroverts, who tend to be much more outgoing, sociable, and gregarious. Some introverts may feel that they have been oppressed in school or in the workplace because of their introspective nature. Here is a portion of the article, but please read it in its entirety at the link above, along with reading some of the reader's comments. BTW, which are you, introvert or extrovert? I'm an introvert.

Introverts run the world -- quietly

By Susan Cain, Special to CNN
updated 9:38 AM EDT, Sun March 18, 2012

The theory of evolution. The theory of relativity. The Cat in the Hat. All were brought to you by introverts.

Our culture is biased against quiet and reserved people, but introverts are responsible for some of humanity's greatest achievements -- from Steve Wozniak's invention of the Apple computer to J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter. And these introverts did what they did not in spite of their temperaments -- but because of them.

As the science journalist Winifred Gallagher writes: "The glory of the disposition that stops to consider stimuli rather than rushing to engage with them is its long association with intellectual and artistic achievement. Neither E=mc2 nor Paradise Lost was dashed off by a party animal."

Introverts make up a third to a half the population. That's one out of every two or three people you know.

Yet our most important institutions -- our schools and our workplaces -- are designed for extroverts. And we're living with a value system that I call the New Groupthink, where we believe that all creativity and productivity comes from an oddly gregarious place.

Picture the typical classroom. When I was a kid, we sat in rows of desks, and we did most of our work autonomously. But nowadays many students sit in "pods" of desks with four or five students facing each other, and they work on countless group projects -- even in subjects like math and creative writing. Kids who prefer to work by themselves don't fit, and research by educational psychology professor Charles Meisgeier found that the majority of teachers believe the ideal student is an extrovert -- even though introverts tend to get higher grades, according to psychologist Adrian Furnham.

The same thing happens at work. Many of us now work in offices without walls, with no respite from the noise and gaze of co-workers. And introverts are routinely passed over for leadership positions, even though the latest research by the management professor Adam Grant at Wharton shows that introverted leaders often deliver better results. They're better at letting proactive employees run with their creative ideas, while extroverts can unwittingly put their own stamp on things and not realize that other people's ideas aren't being heard.

Of course, we all fall at different points along the introvert-extrovert spectrum. Even Carl Jung, who popularized these terms in the first place, said there was no such thing as a pure introvert or a pure extrovert -- that "such a man would be in a lunatic asylum." There's also a term, ambivert, for people who fall smack in the middle of the spectrum.

(read the rest at cnn.com)

Friday, March 16, 2012

Oppression in Sports?

bu guest blogger CC

This week I came across two incidents of rhetoric being used to oppress in the world of sports.

first
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaab-the-dagger/southern-miss-band-chants-where-green-card-puerto-205326741.html during the NCAA tournament the band from the other team taunted a Puerto Rican player.

the second is an article about a local Detroit Basketball game that turned ugly when the Catholic school student section began chants that made fun of the econmic status that many student at King HS in Detroit face http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20120313/OPINION03/203130328/1332/OPINION0317/Detroit-King-s-comfortable-win-turns-uncomfortable
So why is it that people feel they can chant whatever they want at sporting events? Do they foster that much of a mob mentality that people shout against their better judgement?

Black Sitcoms Try to Make a Comeback

by guest blogger Mike S.

As we've discussed in class over the past few weeks, sitcoms have largely been focused on white families and friends since the beginning of broadcast television. Even as diversity has increased with many sitcoms including prominent powerful women, gay people, etc. there is still a major lack of black representation on TV. This article delineates the strange dichotomy that people have forced upon black sitcoms: there must either being an affluent black family (Cosby Show) or a stereotypical "ghetto" situation. The article argues that it's dangerous to force these monolithic expectations on black TV. It argues for a middle ground where the myriad of experiences of black folks are portrayed.

Thursday, March 15, 2012

Virginia Legislation Regarding Abortion

The following link describes recent legislation passed in Virginia that requires a woman to have an ultrasound performed before receiving the right to abort. Not only is this law absolutely archaic and atrocious --- it requires the woman to absorb another medical cost no reason (than to keep bible-wielding republicans theoretically happy until another planned parenthood pops up.)

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2012/mar2012/virg-m12.shtml

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Oppressive Language on Facebook

by guest blogger CFlores6

I have been writing down statuses posted on Facebook, by my “friends,” that I think could be considered oppressive. Here are some of them:

Today is kick a ginger day. I think that is mean but I would definitely kick this ginger lol (picture of little boy with red hair)”

“Can’t wait to go home! I’m tired of being around Muslims and people that can’t speak English!”

“To be a liberal or conservative is to be close minded.”

“I'm going to start using the term "nigga" since it's okay for everyone else to use it.”-posted by a white female

“Our generation is going to do some serious damage in this world.. I'm scared. Just a bunch of retarded, wanna-be ghetto, idiots.”

“this is my goal for the summer, (picture of young girl in a bikini on a motorcycle)” -posted by a young male

“Just heard an Asian singing a country song! Lol”

When I stopped and paid attention I found that I am surrounded by demeaning and stereotypical language like this. I have realized that I am just as guilty for this oppression as the people making these comments because I don’t speak out against it. I know others have been in the same situation as I have. What do you say to your “friends”? What would you say to some of these people?

Monday, March 12, 2012

Role of Class in Oppression?

by guest blogger Jenni

There is now a huge gap in educational achievement and enrollment of colleges due to income and class of parents. If kids come from a lower earning home then they are more apt to not finish college or even attend college due in part to lack of funds and lack of assistance such as Pell Grants. Kids who come from higher earning homes tend to go to college and finish college in a timely manner. They are more apt to go to more prestigious colleges than kids from lower income homes. This is an issue for politicians and how taxing colleges could create a financial barrier, and make it harder for all people to attend college. Would this be considered oppression to the lower class and their children?

http://campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/12/the-reproduction-of-privilege/

Thursday, March 8, 2012

Who is Joseph Kony?

by guest blogger LadayDiva21

LADYDIVA21 is my name...
WHO IS JOSEPH KONY??...
PLEASE WATCH THIS VIDEO AND JOIN THE ACT IN MOTION...

http://t.co/uw61F931

Since 1987 he's been the leader of a gorilla rebel group called LORD RESISTANCE ARMY...((THE LRA)) once he started becoming short on soldiers he started kidknapping little children, making this fighters in his army and making little girls sex slaves... In his ((26 )) years of existance he has managed to abduct 30 thousands little children!! THE LRA has also managed to misplace 2.1 million people...I watched a video done by the invisible children organization and I encourage all of you watch the video and educate yourselves on this topic... It's an oppressing yet liberating experience how the "invisible children" organization used the power of their words to help these children in Uganda survive this man"Joseph Kony" and his evil actions with the LRA...

SO I ENCOURAGE EVERYONE TO CHECK THIS OUT... If the story makes you angry, or moves you in any way...people join me in their quest to make JOSEPH KONY FAMOUS...((NOT)) to celebrate him or anything of that nature but to make people award of who he is and to get people involved in bringing him down..LETS help national forces bring him to justice!

Tagged below is the website to get involved... Kony2012.com.
Or
http://www.invisiblechildren.com.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com/

Thanks for reading..;-)

Questions?...
**After viewing the video how did make you feel?...
**What did you get from it of anything?...
**Would this cause be something that you would like to part take in?...

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Teacher Bashing through Evaluations

by guest blogger M. Peoples

This Blog deals with the subject of teacher bashing by way of evaluation practices. The question I would like to pose to everyone is that of whether or not using such deep
criterion for teachers is oppressing them or simply taking advantage of the freedom of speech. Read for yourselves and then make a decision.

by guest blogger Mike S.

Over the past few years the United States has experienced a troubling crisis of anti-Latino sentiment. Xenophobia towards Latinos is likely the product of white anxiety over the growing economic, social, and cultural power of the Latino community and the threat this poses to white hegemony. As a result of these misplaced anxieties several states such as Arizona have enacted racially motivated and ineffective laws to curve immigration and intimidate Latinos. A new report from the Southern Poverty Law Center recently found that Alabama's passage of law HB 56 is having an especially damaging effect on the Latino community. Amongst other troubling implications HB 56 requires police officers to check for immigration papers at the most routine of stops, it prohibits undocumented immigrants from receiving any public benefits, and undocumented children must be ejected from their schools.


Besides the direct legal consequences of the law, the SPLC notes that it creates an intense atmosphere of xenophobia and functions as a de facto endorsement of racist acts. The report goes on to explain that people have been refused treatment at hospitals, payment for work, and even running water in their homes.


http://www.splcenter.org/alabamas-shame-hb56-and-the-war-on-immigrants


NYPD Commissioner defends Surveillance and Monitoring of Muslim American Communities

by guest blogger Gordon Shumway.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/raymond-kelly-defends-spying-calling-essential-safety-strategy-city-article-1.1032607

http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/05/muslim-leaders-rally-in-support-of-police-dept/?scp=5&sq=racism&st=cse

The NY Daily News article deals with Commissioner Ray Kelly of the NYPD defending his department's surveillance and monitoring of Muslim Americans in New York City and Muslim students on college campuses across the east coast of the United States, while the New York Times city room blog article deals with Muslim American Leaders who showed their support Monday morning in front of the NYPD headquarters to defend the actions of the NYPD toward the Muslim American communities which included the surveillance and monitoring of said communities with the intent of catching terrorists. I picked the second article based on the content to further the conversation on the subject matter.

In the first article Commissioner Ray Kelly spoke to a group of people inside the Cipriani Wall Street Ballroom, while there were people outside protesting, asking for his resignation. What people are not quick to point out is the NYPD is stereotyping Muslims and people of middle eastern decent by doing this sort of surveillance and or monitoring. When Commissioner Kelly says “The Police Department uses many of the same methods to find and stop terrorists that we use to arrest drug dealers, human traffickers and gang leaders,” I wonder what exactly he means by that, and whether or not similar actions toward different minorities are being done for these categories as well.

In the second article Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser who narrated the propaganda film “The Third Jihad” (which was used as a training video for the NYPD), spoke in front of the NYPD head quarters defending their surveillance and monitoring of Muslim American communities in New York and across state lines. Dr Jasser says “We are not here to criticize the N.Y.P.D., but rather to thank them for the monitoring of extremists that the Muslims should be doing,”. Should they? I mean if anyone sees anything suspicious they should report it, but since when is it the Muslim communities' distinct responsibility to keep tabs on each other and make sure no one's a terrorist? Dr. Jasser later says in the article “In no way do we want to be spied on... But this is not about spying. This is about monitoring and public programs.” Actually it is about spying. Until last November, these communities had no idea this was going on. Just because the people who flew the p lanes into the twin towers just happened to be Muslim and from the Middle East, does not mean that everyone from that religion or region wants to do the same, and when you monitor and spy on those people, it kind of shows that you feel this way. Although it is great the NYPD was capable of stopping “more than a dozen terror plots since 9/11”, it is rather disappointing that a group of people needs to be singled out to do so. I mean would they have been able to stop these plots without the surveillance and monitoring of the whole community? I think this is an important question that deserves to be answered.

Oppression in Entertainment: Growing Pains

by guest blogger Simone:

While we are covering the topic of Oppression in Entertainment this week, I learned that former child actor, Kirk Cameron of the 80's show, 'Growing Pains', is a born again Christian who made some oppressive and controversial comments about gays on his talk show appearance on the Piers Morgan show last week. He said that homosexuality was "unnatural", and added, "I think that it’s detrimental, and ultimately destructive to so many of the foundations of civilization.”

Many celebrities and people all over social media have criticized Cameron for his narrow ways of thinking. And in light of Rush Limbaugh's inflammatory and hateful comments towards a young female law student (calling her a slut), we have two new examples of high-profile persons using public communication mediums to express oppressive verbiage that are extremely offensive to persons that the sentiments are directed at. I personally feel that Kirk Cameron should apologize for what he said... but he may not as many people who strongly share the same faith as he, may feel the same way. Read the attached article, and make note of Kirk's former TV dad, Robin Thicke's failed attempt at being humorous!

http://popwatch.ew.com/2012/03/06/kirk-cameron-reactions-alan-thicke-tracey-gold/

Every family has one. Even the Seavers. Members of Kirk Cameron’s Growing Pains family, including Alan Thicke and Tracey Gold, are among those in Hollywood disappointed to hear what Mike Seaver has turned into. Camereon, a born-again Christian, has recently come under fire for making controversial statements about homosexuality. The 41-year-old actor/writer/director told CNN’s Piers Morgan he thought homosexuality is “unnatural,” adding, “I think that it’s detrimental, and ultimately destructive to so many of the foundations of civilization.”

Those comments caught the attention of GLAAD, who shot back at the star, “Kirk Cameron sounds even more dated than his 1980s TV character.” But they aren’t the only ones speaking up. Thicke, Cameron’s TV dad from Growing Pains, responded on Twitter, “I’ll address kirk’s comments as soon as I recover from rush limbaugh’s” and “I’m getting him some new books. The Old Testament simply can’t be expected to explain everything.” Thicke later tweeted, “I love Kirk but I may have to spank him…’tho not in a gay way!”

Gold, who played Cameron’s sister on the hit series, took to her Twitter as well to speak out against her former co-star’s opinions on the gay and lesbian community. Gold, whose Twitter profile picture is from the NOH8 campaign wrote, “I am a strong supporter of the #LGBT Community, and I believe in equal rights for all. #NOH8 #LOVE.”

But the Seavers aren’t the only ones disappointed in Cameron. Fellow 80s television staples like Neil Patrick Harris tweeted, “That Kirk Cameron is hilarious!” while Roseanne Barr wrote from her page, “Kirk or kurt or whatever Cameron is an accomplice to murder with his hate speech.”

Additionally, Modern Family‘s Jesse Tyler Ferguson posted, “The only unnatural thing about me being gay is that I had a crush on Kirk Cameron until about 24 hours ago,” and Raising Hope‘s Martha Plimpton wrote, “The word “Equality” shows up too much in our founding documents for anyone to pretend it’s not the American way. #usethe19th #equalitynow.”

The Good Wife‘s Josh Charles joked from his page, “I know Growing Pains was only a tv show, but I have to think both Alan Thicke & Joanna Kerns must feel they failed as parents tonight.”

While Craig Ferguson, Debra Messing, Michael Showalter, and Dave Holmes have all joined in speaking out against Cameron, he does seem to have one supporter in Hollywood: Stephen Baldwin. The conservative actor wrote in response to Cameron’s now-infamous Piers Morgan Tonight appearance, “GREAT JOB Kirk !!! Let’s pray one day Piers Morgan finds true Salvation, God Bless!”

"Here We Go . . . Again."

By guest blogger Purple

On February 20th, Montana's chief federal judge, Richard Cebull forwarded a racially charged email about President Obama from his courthouse email to six or seven (varying reports) recipients. His email reads:

"A MOM'S MEMORY"

"Normally I don't send or forward a lot of these, but even by my standards, it was a bit touching. I want all of my friends to feel what I felt when I read this. Hope it touches your heart like it did mine."

"A little boy said to his mother; 'Mommy, how come I'm black and you're white?'" the email jokje reads. "His mother replied, 'Don't eben go there Barack! From what I can remember about that party, you're lucky you don't bark.'"

Cebull has since publicly apologized, stating he sent the email because he's "anti- Obama" but not racist. He admits that the email does have racist content, but that was not his intention in sending it. He also says the email was not meant to go public, and was meant to be private communication among acquaintances. He's also requested a judicial review.

What are your thoughts on his actions? Do you think he should be reprimanded?

*For me, the fact that the email was forwarded from his professional email address speaks volumes on the impact of language in this situation.

Article providing initial detail:


Articles detailing Cebull's apology:

http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/01/10549045-us-judge-forwards-racist-email-about-obama

Saturday, March 3, 2012

Fluke on Limbaugh comment: 'I'm not going to be silenced'

by guest blogger Patrice G.


The article below highlights how people attack people with words, which are not even fitting to describe them as- simply because the views and opinions of others' are different from their views and opinions pertaining to various issues and topics discussed. Illuminates in the article and video is how some people target others' with derogatory names, because others' have different views and opinions and because others' challenge their views and opinions. The situation is an example of how people create a context or take what other's say out of context as a excuse to call/label others as things which are not indicative of who a person is, the things they said, say, do, or the life they live.

It's quite obvious the Georgetown Law Student Sandra Fluke was attacked by Rush Limbaugh who used words including the word "Slut" to inflict judgment and pain towards Fluke, because her views do not coincide with his views and opinions pertaining to contraception. Rush Limbaugh and others' like him attempt to use words to silence people from continuing to share their views and opinions in life, but Fluke refused and continues to refuse to be silenced by Limbaugh's attempt to intimidate her with hurtful words he used to define her, her views, and the reasoning for her views.

So, I pose the following questions:

Do you agree with Rush Limbaugh that Sandra Fluke views about contraception makes her a "Slut"-Yes or No, Why? Explain.

How would you feel if someone called/labeled you with derogatory names, because they don't agree with your views and opinions and like Fluke you know you're none of the things you have been called/labeled?

Do you think it would it ever truly be possible to decrease and/or stop people from calling/labeling people as derogatory names, because others' views and opinions don't agree with theirs-Yes or No, Why? Explain.

Put yourself in Flukes situation. What actions would you take if an individual or group called/labeled you derogatory names, simply because your views and opinions did not agree with theirs? Would you stop voicing your views and opinions? Would you choose to be silent?

Instead of Slut, what if because of your views and opinions you were called/labeled something you're not like Fluke: Hoe, Bitch, Nigger, Frigid, Faggot, Racist, Homophobe, Bigot, Anti-Semitic, Stupid, Dumb, Pickaninny, Uncle Tom, Mammy, Aunt Jemima, Buck, Senile, Shrew, Coon, Spade, Wetback, White trash, Whore, Shiftless, Peon, Nip, Jap, Dyke, Lesbian, Broad, Airhead etc…How would you feel? What would you do?


Posted by

CNN Senior Congressional Correspondent Dana Bash

(CNN) - The Georgetown law student targeted by Rush Limbaugh for her position on contraceptives said Friday she was "upset and outraged" when she first heard the radio talk show host had called her a "slut."

"I felt probably the way many women do when they are called those types of names," Sandra Fluke told CNN. "Initially hurt and then very quickly upset and outraged because somebody is trying to silence you."


Fluke, who advocated last week in a Democratic hearing for the Obama policy requiring employers provide free contraception coverage, said she was sitting at a computer Wednesday when she read online that Limbaugh had personally attacked her during his radio show.


Calling her a "slut" and "prostitute," Limbaugh has said if taxpayers are going to pay for women to have sex, then they should post videos of their activities so everyone can watch.


His comments have sparked a firestorm in the last two days, with Democrats seizing on it as an opportunity to keep the political story alive.

President Barack Obama called Fluke on Friday to offer his support.

"That wasn't on my schedule for the day," Fluke joked, referring to Obama's call. "But I was happy to add that to the schedule."


The law student told CNN she thinks Limbaugh was "confused" about her testimony.

"For starters, I didn't say that I should be paid for anything. What we were talking about is private insurance covering a medical need. It has nothing to do with the government paying for anything or taxpayers or anything like that," she said.

While Fluke attends a Jesuit university that does not cover contraception as part of its health insurance plans, the school's president defended Fluke on Friday.

Religiously-affiliated institutions, like Georgetown, oppose providing contraception.

While some Republicans argue abstinence as the best form of birth control, Fluke said legislation needs to be realistic.


"We're talking about national legislation. Legislation has to reflect reality, not ideology and I don't think that we can actually expect that American women are going to stop engaging in healthy sexual behaviors," Fluke said.

But the law student said women are not going to be "silenced" about the issue.


"They're going to speak up for health care needs and what this means to them and I'm certainly not going to be silenced," she said.


Article and Video Link:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/02/fluke-on-limbaugh-comment-im-not-going-to-be-silenced/?hpt=hp_bn3

Friday, March 2, 2012

Racist or Just Being Insensitive?

by guest blogger Rebecca

http://conservativedailynews.com/2012/01/reality-check-racist-politicians/

While most of us know when a clip or line entry is taken out of context, the reporter in this video clip has a good point, during the recent political battle for any coveted position; every single candidate has been called a racist!

· So I ask… is it possible that every one of us has some extent of racism in us?

· Does it slip out unbeknownst to us?

· Is it racism or just insensitive comments…are they the same thing if said with this intent?

I can’t believe that every single candidate running is racist, hopefully they are just ill informed and need to be schooled in politically correct language use??

Rebecca