About Me

Jack Kay is a professor of communication at Eastern Michigan University. He studies the power of language.

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Politicians, Slurs, and Apologia: Lansing, Michigan

Reported by Dawson Bell in yesterday's Freep in the article "Lansing Mayor Offers Apology in the Wake of American Indian Remarks":

http://www.freep.com/article/20120130/NEWS06/120130016/Indian-tribes-Lansing-mayor-Virg-Bernero-racial-remarks-casino

Bell wrote:

Lansing Mayor Virg Bernero, under fire for what two Michigan tribes described as a string of anti-Indian racial slurs at a fund-raising speech last week, denied Monday that he directed his remarks toward Americans Indians, but apologized “to any and all who were offended by my choice of words.”

The Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Potawatomi and the Saginaw Chippewas, who are opponents of a proposed casino in Lansing that would be operated by another tribe, said Bernero “repeatedly used profanity and racial slurs in describing the (casino) controversy.”

The tribes said Bernero referred to a bull’s-eye on his back and said that he was the target of “bows and arrows” for championing the casino proposal.

James Nye, a Lansing lobbyist for the Nottawaseppi and Saginaw Chippewas, who is a member of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, said he was told by several people attending the fund-raiser that Bernero singled him out as “Chief Chicken Little.”

Nye said the remarks, at a Thursday morning mayoral fund-raiser, were “inexcusable.”

. . . Bernero was not available to comment. But his office issued a statement at midday Monday saying the mayor disagreed with his critics.

"My passionate support for Lansing and our casino project may have gotten the better of me, but none of my remarks were directed toward Native Americans, and nothing I said can fairly be construed as a racial slur,” he said. “I make no apologies for using strong language against our opponents … but I do offer my heartfelt and sincere apology to any and all who were offended by my choice of words.”

Comments?

Nivea's New Ad Racist? -UPDATE

by guest Blogger Patrice G.

Racism has not ever disappeared in the United States of America or the world for that matter, racism is shown in more subtle ways, at times, to try to appear not to be offensive. For example, August 17, 2011 Kiri Blakeley on Forbes.com reveals, "Nivea cream’s new ad for Nivea For Men is seriously offending some in the black community. The ad shows a short-haired black man in a gray sweater tossing the head of a black man with an Afro and beard (presumably his earlier non-Nivea self), with the motto: “Look Like You Give A Damn…. Re-Civilize Yourself.”

The "black community" has every right to be upset and offended, since you would hope after "generations of suffering at the hands of white racist and racist institutions" (Locke, p.112, 2009), ignorance from fortune 500 companies would realizes how offensive the add was before the idea made it way to full advertising. Only after the "black community" was outraged on sites like Facebook, Twitter, and blogs did Nivea offer an apology:
Nivea For Men posted an apology for the ad on its Facebook wall:

Thank you for caring enough to give us your feedback about the recent “Re-civilized” NIVEA FOR MEN ad. This ad was inappropriate and offensive. It was never our intention to offend anyone, and for this we are deeply sorry. This ad will never be used again. (http://www.forbes.com/sites/kiriblakeley/2011/08/17/niveas-new-ad-racist/)

You be the judge of whether the ad is racist or not? Can you identify how this promotes ancient stereotypes of the "BUCK" "SLAVE" "UNCLE TOM" perception of African American males or not?

http://www.good.is/post/nivea-s-racist-ad-re-civilizes-a-black-man/

http://www.forbes.com/sites/kiriblakeley/2011/08/17/niveas-new-ad-racist/

Reference: Locke, B (2009). Racial stigma on the hollywood screen from world war II to the present. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

YouTube Meme: "**** People Say"

by guest blogger Purple


A popular meme has been circulating the YouTube world. The meme follows the theme of “sh*t people say” and originated from the YouTube video titled, “Sh*t Girls Say”. Since the original video, the meme has taken off, as people from all walks of life continue to create their own videos and exhaust the list of things people say. The videos rely on stereotypes and personal experiences to create parodies of every day actions and encounters of different people. This YouTube trend of rapid expression of opinion demonstrates people’s comfortability using YouTube for freedom of speech. These parodies have connected people through laughter, dialogue, and common experience. What do you think?

Check out the video that started it all and then check out some of the others:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-yLGIH7W9Y

Facebook and Hate Speech?

By guest blogger Caleb:

This past week I feel like I've become much more aware of just how much hate speech is on the Internet and I found a couple of examples of it leaking onto the website Facebook, a website that many of us use daily. this first link is to an article about a cop who had to be investigated by the secret service after he posted some pictures teenagers with automatic weapons who used President Obama shirts as targets.

http://www.complex.com/city-guide/2012/01/arizona-cop-takes-picture-of-gun-toting-teens-holding-bullet-riddled-obama-t-shirt

The second link is a little hard to look at but it is important because these people are posting these things on Facebook which is interesting because they are not anonymous to us as users. *This is upsetting* http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/the-40-absolutely-worst-people-in-america

Do you see Facebook as a avenue where Hate Speech could gain momentum?

Monday, January 30, 2012

Religious Discrimination at a University?

By guest blogger M.P.

The situation described in the Detroit Free Press article linked below deals with a young lady who was dismissed from her academic graduate program for declining to professionally deal with sexual orientation of homosexuals during her counseling sessions. She has taken matters into the legal system as she feels she was discriminated because of her religious beliefs. However, she did agree that she would work with people of this orientation during counseling sessions she just would not discuss their sexual orientation and relationships as it goes against her religious beliefs. In this situation it is hard to tell whether the University is using her religion against her academically and professionally but it sure does seem that way. Below is the link with the full story detailing the events that lead up to her expulsion and the actions that she has taken thus far. What are your thoughts on this situation? Is she being discriminatory or discriminated against?

Link:http://www.freep.com/article/20120128/NEWS06/201280407/Expelled-Eastern-Michigan-University-grad-student-can-take-case-jury-over-refusal-counsel-gay-lifestyle

Opposing Racism: TAM Airlines

from Fun and run facebook community

"This happened on TAM airlines.

A 50-something year old white woman arrived at her seat and saw that the passenger next to her was a black man. Visibly furious, she called the air hostess.
"What's the problem, ma?" the hostess asked her
...
"Can't you see?" the lady said - "I was given a seat next to a black man. I can't seat here next to him. You have to change my seat"
"Please, calm down, ma" - said the hostess

"Unfortunately, all the seats are occupied, but I'm still going to check if we have any." The hostess left and returned some minutes later.

"Madam, as I told you, there isn't any empty seat in this class- economy class. But I spoke to the captain and he confirmed that there isn't any empty seats in the economy class. We only have seats in the first class."

And before the woman said anything, the hostess continued
"Look, it is unusual for our company to allow a passenger from the economy class change to the first class. However, given the circumstances, the commandant thinks that it would be a scandal to make a passenger travel sat next to an unpleasant person." And turning to the black man, the hostess said: "Which means, Sir, if you would be so nice to pack your handbag, we have reserved you a seat in the first class..." And all the passengers nearby, who were shocked to see the scene started applauding, some standing on their feet.""

Michigander? Insult to Women?

article from mlive.com

http://www.mlive.com/news/index.ssf/2012/01/is_the_term_michigander_an_ins.html


“Is the term Michigander an insult to women?”


Published January 28, 2012, 2:53 PM

Updated: Saturday, January 28, 2012, 4:11 PM

By Jim Harger

http://media.mlive.com/design/baseline/img/roundbox_arrow_up.gif

Share close

Digg Stumble Upon Fark Reddit

Is “Michigander” insulting to women?

Gov. Rick Snyder was confronted with the question of how to describe state residents at his appearance before the Michigan Press Association last week.

A woman in the audience asked him to use “Michiganian” instead, arguing “Michigander” is not gender neutral.

Snyder said he once asked an expert to investigate the origins of each to determine which was best.

“After 45 minutes, he said, 'Either one.'”

Snyder promised to continue investigating.

Sunday, January 29, 2012

Looking Back to Sinatra, Martin, and Davis

by Guest Blogger Virginia Camille

It is important to see things in context. Below is a clip from 1965 where Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin and Sammy Davis Jr are performing live. It is interesting to be able to observe the differences in context between today and 1965. If you notice there are two different bands; one is marked "CB" and the other has no identifier. As you can imagine the "CB" stands for colored band and they only perform when Sammy Davis Jr is performing or when the whole group is performing a work written by Sammy Davis Jr. It is also interesting to listen to the jokes and quips all three of them come up with while on stage. Frank, Dean and Sammy all make racial jokes and use language that are relevant to the time but oppressive no matter how you look at it.
This clip is just a portion of the performance they gave. Earlier in the performance they each come on stage individually and give their own performances which is also very interesting in the context of this class. But the interaction here sums up the time quite well. If you have time view it and see how much of it you pick up on; some is pretty blatant and some you really have to pay attention.

http://youtu.be/rUtjUy3UgMA

He said, She said in Weehawken

http://www.nj.com/jjournal-news/index.ssf/2012/01/weehawken_municipal_employee_f.html

by Guest Blogger: Simone

A long time Department of Public Works female employee has filed a lawsuit against her employer for a sexist work environment and retaliation for her whistle-blowing for a civil rights violation. Her lawsuit claims that a large graffiti drawing of a woman's breasts and male genitals was on the wall outside of her office. She also claims that a sexist attitude is prolific throughout Weehawken. However, the Mayor has said that the lawsuit is frivolous, and states that the woman has never said anything to him about these allegations.

If sexism is rampant in Weehawken, perhaps the woman has felt oppressed for many years by working and living in an environment that was not providing fair opportunities to women. For the Mayor to denounce her lawsuit as "public blackmail", perhaps his opinion provides insight into what it might be like to work under the litigant's male-oriented chain of command. Also in her lawsuit, she says she was passed over for a promotion in a position that was vacant for three years, until a man was hired for that job in 2010.

---

A Weehawken employee has filed a multi-million-dollar lawsuit against her employer for allegedly creating a sexist work environment, which she says included obscene graffiti outside her office.

The lawsuit, filed by Assistant Recycling Coordinator Pilar Bardroff, also alleges retaliation against her for whistle-blowing and civil rights violations.

If she were to win the civil action complaint filed with Hudson County Superior Court on Jan. 9, she would likely net “$1.1 million to $2.1 million,” according to her attorney, Louis Zayas.

Weehawken Mayor Richard Turner called the lawsuit “frivolous nonsense that is an attempt at public blackmail.”

The lawsuit claims that Bardroff’s workplace, 372 Park Ave., until recently had a graffiti drawing that was “a 2-foot by 2-foot drawing” of a man’s genitals and a woman’s breasts. The graffiti was on a cinderblock wall outside her office.

Zayas said the graffiti which was removed after the lawsuit was filed shows “the sexist attitude that permeates throughout Weehawken.”

Turner said neither he nor DPW supervisor Robert Barsa had ever been informed about the lewd drawing.

“I find these allegations impossible to believe since I see Pilar all the time and she never brought this to my attention,” Turner said.

Bardroff, who has worked for the township since 1992 and is paid $34,000 a year, also contends in the suit that she complained about asbestos and other problems in her building, and that is why she was passed over for a promotion.

Bardroff fully expected that she would be named recycling coordinator when the previous coordinator retired on Dec. 31, 2007, the suit says. But the position remained open until 2010, when Jose Rodriguez was named to the post.

The lawsuit claims that Bardroff was much more qualified than Rodriguez, who was paid $60,000 by the township in 2010, according to public records.

Turner argued that Rodriguez is highly qualified for the job since he is a certified recycling coordinator and a licensed engineer. He also noted that Rodriguez, a Department of Public Works employee, received no additional compensation for his new responsibilities.

The recycling coordinator position has been eliminated because of budget cuts over the past two years, Turner said.

“In the old days people would sue for what they lost, now people sue for what they would like to get,” Turner said. “No one on staff would tolerate anything sexist or obscene.”

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Racism in Obama's America One Year Later

by guest blogger Patrice G.

Racism exemplifies ignorance in its highest form and it can be identified in some of the highest positions in government. President Obama being the First Black President of the United States evidently provoked various former and current government officials to show their true colors. The Sarah Netter, January 27, 2010 article “Racism in Obama's America One Year Later”, which can be found on http://abcnews.go.com/WN/Obama/racism-obamas-america-year/story?id=9638178#.Tx9StJhuGFI identifies numerous former and current government officials voicing their opinions on the election of President Obama.

Senate Majority Leader Harry ReidThen, Jan. 2010: One of several high-profile politicians to merit a mention in the controversial book "Game Change," Reid, a Democrat and longtime Obama ally, was cited in the book for describing the president before his election as a "'light-skinned' African American, 'with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.'" Former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich Then, Jan. 2010: Illinois' disgraced former governor told Esquire magazine, "I'm blacker than Barack Obama. I shined shoes. I grew up in a five-room apartment. My father had a little laundromat in a black community not far from where we lived. I saw it all growing up." Tennessee State GOP Staffer Sherri Goforth Then, June 2009: The legislative aid for Republican state Sen. Diane Black was reprimanded in June for forwarding an e-mail image showing all the presidential portraits, with Barack Obama appearing only as a set of white eyes on a black background. She later told the online publication NashvilleisTalking.com that she only felt bad about sending it to the wrong list of people. How can those who are supposed to be of higher intelligence portray a mindset of such ignorance? Similar to the writings of Dr. William Pierce discussed in the assigned reading for CTAC 592 “Hate Speech or Reasonable Racism”, the government officials comments above proves no matter how “book smart” a person can be or become-people can be twice as ignorant as they are intelligent. I believe immediate removal of government officials should be a tactic to show a zero tolerance policy for such ignorance as racism, because it is apparent being reprimanded has no effect at all.

What are your thoughts on the "Racism is Obama's America One Year Later," which can be found on

http://abcnews.go.com/WN/Obama/racism-obamas-america-year/story?id=9638178#.Tx9StJhuGFI

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Reverend: King is 'just as much alive today'"

by guest blogger CFLORES6

http://www.courierpress.com/news/2012/jan/15/reverend-hes-just-as-much-alive-today/

The above link is an article I found from the Evansville Courier & Press (IN), posted January 15, 2012. Reporter, Jared Council, had interviewed different local religious leaders who spoke on the legacy of Martin Luther King. Each person that was interviewed seemed very passionate about the topic. They described Dr. King as a courageous and powerful man and talked about his endless accomplishments. One Reverend quoted.

"Sometimes you become oppressed for so long that you think that nothing will change, And you think you're so low that you can't move forward. But he (Dr. King) gave them the courage to overcome the obstacles of oppression and to move forward."

However, they also emphasized that his work is not finished, and that his dream is not yet complete. They talked about how oppression is still very much alive today. Dr. Zahid Saqib, the president of the Islamic Center of Evansville, explained that Dr. King was "instrumental in evaluating blacks and other minorities to a level of playing field", and that today the playing field is still NOT equal. Especially in areas such as, "disproportionate black dropout rates, incarceration rates and unemployment rates." The article concludes with a quote from a Reverend by the name of Richard Pollard

"He's just as much alive today as he was if he walked on the earth," Pollard said. "He's still here through the activists, through the people who are fighting for freedom for so many people who are disenfranchised. He's still alive working through individuals who are carrying out his mandate."

Obviously the only way to overcome oppression in the world today is to discuss it. We can find examples of abuse and criticize it, such as the discriminatory practices that took place against African-Americans and Latinos in New York City's police force, but we can also find positive examples. What I mean is, we should recognize and shine a light on those who are also fighting to end oppression, who are promoting peace and equality, and who are trying to make a difference, such as local religious leaders from Evansville, IN. In other words, sometimes we should take time to recognize the good instead of strictly focusing on the bad.

Redheads

by guest blogger Canonfoder


The internet is a global platform therefore, I want to take a blog post to talk about something that is a problem especially in the UK. GINGERISM. Ginger is used as a derogatory word for people with red hair people. The gene for red hair is recessive and it is believed that about 2% of the world population has red hair. There is a commonly held belief that the world may not have any red haired people in less than 100 years because of it being a recessive gene. Recessive genes can skip generations and appear without red haired parents as long as they are carriers of the recessive gene. The gene is not in any kind of situation to disappear.

There are two different forms of saying Ginger one of which is less offensive, but still offensive.

Gin/Ger, which sounds like the root spice.

Ging/Er, This one has a soft second G instead, to distinguish the redheads from the root spice.

What is it that causes the red hair? A small amount of brown eumelanin in the absence of other pigments causes blond color hair. While medium amounts of eumelanin or a combination of both eumelanin and pheomelanin causes variations of brown hair. Someone possessing lots of eumelanin and no other pigments will have black hair. The pigment pheomelanin gives red hair its distinctive color. Red hair has far more of the pigment pheomelanin than it has of the dark pigment eumelanin.

As this blog does here is a couple different news stories involving the hatred of the red haired:

This story is the one that got me involved. first. The world's largest sperm bank is at capacity for sperm with the red headed gene. That title for the article clearly states what the article is about. Most titles however were more likeSperm Bank is Refusing Ginger Sperm. Once you read the articles you understand that there just isn't as much of a demand for red headed sperm as others. It is just a case of the demand not being there, the sperm bank is not against people with red hair, those needed sperm are. The second link is to an article related to this makes the sperm bank seem even more red headed hating by listing various cases of gingerism in the UK as well as other places in the world. The news articles are intentionally demonizing the fact that the sperm bank does not need more red headed sperm. Without too much thought I came up with a better title for the article that does not demonize. In addition these were all online publishing places so using a smaller title for the sake of space was not a consideration. Words can change a simple story into a racist attack.

http://www.parentdish.co.uk/2011/09/20/gingers-need-not-apply-worlds-largest-sperm-bank-bans-red-head-donors/

http://www.newsytype.com/11601-redhead-discrimination/

The second news story talks more of the history of gingerism. From dark ages when red hair was a sign of the devil through red hair being beautiful in renaissance art all the way yo gingerism today. A story in the middle is what really caught me by surprise. “Last year, newspapers reported a family fleeing from their home in Newcastle after being the victims of extreme gingism.” While hard to believe the article also states, “'The G word is an anagram of the N word,' says Richard Tyrone Jones. While we may not find ginger that offensive we can definitely relate in the US to its anagram. I can also believe that would drive people to move as well.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2009/jan/24/gingerism-ginger-prejudice

A lighter side of gingerism in the US was shown in the Mythbusters EpisodeNo Pain, No Gain.(episode six of the 2010 season, first aired April 28) Adam and Jamie tackle if different people tolerate pain better, including the stereotype of redheads being able to tolerate less pain. The stereotype is false, the redheads beat all other hair types. Adam Savage being a redhead is especially proud of this outcome.

In the South Park episode Ginger Kids (Season 9 Episode 11) caused a large backlash for their red head based story. The episode was a social commentary on political movements. The used red headed hate speech in school to begin the movement which goes from peaceful to violent quickly in the episode. Some people thought that the episode was truly promoting gingerism because that was the trait used to start the movement.

The language of oppression is a worldwide problem. We must be open and understanding to each facet. If you are interested in the language of oppression around gingerism another person has a blog based around the specific language for gingerism at http://gingerism.com/

Thank you for your time,

Canonfoder